Contoso's tenant was created in 2017, so the root site at https://contoso.sharepoint.com is a classic team site. The administrator wants a modern intranet landing page at the root URL using the Replace site (site swap) operation in the SharePoint admin center. Which candidate satisfies the documented requirements for the incoming site?
Correct answer: B. A communication site (SITEPAGEPUBLISHING#0) on which the publishing feature has never been activated and which is neither a hub site nor associated with any hub.
Microsoft Learn lists the site swap limitations: the new root site must be a communication site (SITEPAGEPUBLISHING#0) or a modern team site that is not connected to a Microsoft 365 group (STS#3), and one where the publishing feature has never been activated. Additionally, when replacing the root site, neither the current site nor the new site can be hub sites or associated with a hub; hubs must be unregistered (or sites disassociated) first, then re-registered after the swap. The root site itself cannot be deleted and cannot be connected to a Microsoft 365 group, which is why swap is the supported replacement path.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A. Classic publishing sites are not a supported incoming template, and any site where the publishing feature was ever activated is disqualified even if it has since been dressed up with modern pages.
- C. Neither the current root nor the incoming site can be a hub or associated with a hub at swap time. A hub must be unregistered before the swap and re-registered afterward; hub status does not carry through.
- D. Group-connected team sites are not eligible incoming sites. Only communication sites or modern team sites without a Microsoft 365 group qualify, and the root site can never be group-connected.
Memory hook: Root swap wants a clean modern site: a comm site or groupless modern team site, publishing never touched, no hub strings attached on either side.
Microsoft Learn: Modern root site



